New York Muslim Judge Swears In on Quarn... and Why This Is Diabolical to the Constitution

Recently a New York judge was sworn in with her hand on the Qur'an... Is this allowed under our Constitution?

di·a·bol·i·cal
ˌdīəˈbälək(ə)l/
adjective
belonging to or so evil as to recall the Devil.
"his diabolical cunning"
synonyms: devilish, fiendish, satanic, demonic, demoniacal, hellish, infernal, evil, wicked, ungodly, unholy

Our country was framed as Judeo-Christian nation, based on the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob. It was based on the Torah, or Bible. To swear an oath by any other God has traditionally never happened or was extremely rare. The Quran is perverted in how it is all made up. For instance they switched it from Abraham having to sacrifice Isaac, to Ishmael. Ishmael's seed being from where Muslims originate... They want to credit Muslims as receiving God's blessing, not the Israelites who adhere to His Law. Shariah law is but complete lawlessness. 

To me while it might not be an official mandate in the Constitution, everyone was agreed upon the God to which they were referring. All original laws were based upon His Word. To me it is insulting as it is sort of granting permission for Muslims to bring their hatred and violence to this nation. Sound minded men have the duty to try and warn the masses as to keep the women and children safe. Any Muslim man that is not instituting acts of violence is not a fully indoctrinated Muslim. It is not a deviation from Islam, but the true intention of Islam.

A friend of  mine had this to say, which makes some very good points:
 Insulting is different than unconstitutional.

I will refer you first to the 1st amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

Second, the affirmation is a verbal oath. Tradition from English common law is to swear on a bible, though this is not a requirement to swear on the bible. It is a personal choice.

It's also worth pointing out that just because something has been done once, does not mean it is legal, Constitutional, or right. My sister made some really good points about the run away judicial branch we now have in America The judicial branch of the government, has grown beyond its intended purpose: judges now make laws for the people. Their original job was to interpret the law and Constitution as it was written by our founding fathers. The constitution was written by men who believed in the Judeo/Christian God, based on the morals set forth by Him. It was written for a people who also believed in that same God. When the first amendment was written, the word "religion" was primarily understood at the time to mean different denominations and faiths within that. John Adams, his son John Quincy, and Thomas Jefferson all read the Qur'an and hailed it as heretical and evil. John Adams, when asked why he read it said it was to be able to know his enemy. I respect him for that as I could not do it, it takes a real man to be able to do that. My point is, if it goes against what our founding fathers intended when they wrote the constitution, then, yes, I agree, it is unconstitutional. Ironically, it's a judge who is supposed to interpret what they intended...

Justice Brewer, writing for the Supreme Court, stated that:

"Even the Constitution of the United States, which is supposed to have little touch upon the private life of the individual, contains in the First Amendment a declaration common to the constitutions of all the States, as follows: 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' etc. And also provides in Article 1, section 7, (a provision common to many constitutions,) that the Executive shall have ten days (Sundays excepted) within which to determine whether he will approve or veto a bill.

This  is a profound Supreme Case ruling that came straight from the founder's mouths and I might say the throne room of God:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/143/457/case.html

To this I refer to Thomas Jefferson, who, while did not pen the Constitution, was there in all the action with the forming of our great nation  `On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.' (Thomas Jefferson, Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson


It's very simple: you can't swear to uphold truth on a written text that promotes lying to "infidels" which most Americans are. We don't know if she told the truth to uphold the Constitution because her faith allows for lying... THAT is unConstitutional

The Judeo-Christian principles our country are founded upon denounce lying.

I know that many Muslims may not believe in lying but and many Christians and Jews probably lie, however, by placing your hand on a book that encourages deceit to promote and protect their religion is UnConstitutional...

Look at the smile on his face when he says to the converted Jew "now if you drink we will kill you, see we cured your alcoholism.." Mohommand actually says it is wrong to take Christians and Jews as friends... 

An ex-Muslim recounts his time during the Gulf War when the war updates were on TV at work and Americans were killed, he shook his head in saddness, then on his way home he would open his car window and yell Allah Akbar and go back to his apartment complex which was mostly Muslim and they would all get together and when the "enemy" ie Americans were killed, they would all shout Allah Akbar... but the company of Americans they would shake their head in sadness... 

      THIS is exactly why I believe Obama lies so much. He is a Muslim and he has lies to promote his agenda... That being said, it's like the Vietnam War... I don't think all Muslims are lying but the Viet Cong would use children to kill Americans but not all North Vietnamese were Viet Cong... but it's a very touchy issue

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/05/1063-documented-examples-of-barack-obamas-lying-lawbreaking-corruption-cronyism-hypocrisy-waste-etc/
      
        The Constitution is based on the principle of Individual Freedom and Liberty which is espoused and promoted in the Bible... These freedoms are in direct contradiction to the Muslim faith... as promoted in the Quran and it's subsequent Shariah Law...The blueprint or way of life of the Muslim is contradictory to American freedom and Independence... and thus, un Constitutional. While Muslims are free to live in America, the truth is, they must adapt to American Liberty and freedom. If I go to Saudia Arabia, I cannot drive a car... In most Arab countries I would be legally bound to cover from head to toe... Why is this? The implementation of Islamic law... what is found in the Quran... Any Muslim who would uphold the Constitution and Christian basis for the laws in this country would have to go AGAINST their faith, and thus, it would be more prudent for a Muslim to put their hands on a Bible or a copy of the laws of this land, rather than a text that is very much against what our founding fathers fought and died for.

America's Founders and Islam

     America's earliest presidents best understood these founding principles. They were not only deeply involved with their formal adoption, but they were professionally competent in explaining them. When confronted with an Islamic threat, they took the effort to consult primary sources and to conduct competent analysis of that threat.

    In 1786, Thomas Jefferson, ambassador to France, and John Adams, ambassador to England, met with the emissary of the Islamic potentates of Tripoli to Britain, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, regarding the demands for tribute being made at the time by the so-called Barbary Pirates.

      Afterwards, Jefferson and Adams sent a four-page report to the Congress describing this meeting. The relevant portion of their report reads:

    "We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretensions to make war upon Nations who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.


   "The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Qur'an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."

    John Adams' son and our sixth president, John Quincy Adams, whose formative years coincided with the founding of the republic, offers further insights into the early presidents' views on this subject. Like many Americans, he took an oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And, when faced with an Islamic enemy, he understood his obligation to be educated on the factual aspects of the principles, doctrines, objectives, jurisprudence and theology of shariah that comprised his enemy's threat doctrine.

   John Quincy Adams' 136-page series of essays on Islam displayed a clear understanding of the threat facing America then - and now, especially from the permanent Islamic institutions of jihad and dhimmitude. Regarding these two topics, Adams states:

  "...[Mohammed] declared undistinguishing and exterminating war as a part of his religion against all the rest of mankind.... The precept of the Quran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that [Mohammed] is the prophet of God.

"The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute. As the essential principle of [Mohammed's] faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated.

"The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.

"This appeal to the natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels is in just accordance with the precepts of the Quran. The document [the Quran] does not attempt to disguise it, nor even pretend that the enmity of those whom it styles the infidels, is any other than the necessary consequence of the hatred borne by the Mussulmen to them - the paragraph itself, is a forcible example of the contrasted character of the two religions.

"The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. There is no denomination of Christians, which denies or misunderstands this doctrine. All understand it alike - all acknowledge its obligations; and however imperfectly, in the purposes of Divine Providence, its efficacy has been shown in the practice of Christians, it has not been wholly inoperative upon them. Its effect has been upon the manners of nations. It has mitigated the horrors of war - it has softened the features of slavery - it has humanized the intercourse of social life. The unqualified acknowledgement of a duty does not, indeed, suffice to insure its performance. Hatred is yet a passion, but too powerful upon the hearts of Christians. Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. No state paper from a Christian hand, could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord and Master, have commenced by an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Ottoman lays it down as the foundation of his discourse."


       In conclusion, it is clear from the writings of several of our earliest presidents, as well as the texts of the nation's founding documents, that American principles are not at odds with - and imperiled by - some "radical" or "extreme" version of Islam. Rather, it is the mainstream doctrine of shariah that constitutes the threat to the U.S. Constitution and the freedoms it enshrines. That incompatibility has several practical implications: For one thing, the shariah legal code cannot be insinuated into America - even through stealthy means or democratic processes - without violating the Constitution's Article VI Supremacy Clause, which requires that the Constitution "shall be the supreme Law of the land."

https://www.nccs.net/2011-11-the-u-s-constitution-and-sharia-law.phpAnother reason why a Muslim cannot be sworn in on a Quran ...

     The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are married documents, meant to be understood together... you cannot believe that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights if you do not believe in the God of Creation.... this is a fact, while we have many secular people in office, that does not negate the fact that their beliefs are fundamentally against the founding documents of this country... And by Creator, this is meant the Divine hand of the one God... 

And certainly, this judge cannot uphold the Constitution of New York.. you may not agree with the fact that almost every single state Constitution acknowledges God but New York's does... and by Almighty God, this is the God of the Juedo-Christian Bible..

http://www.libertyunderfire.org/2011/07/five-references-to-god-in-the-declaration-of-independence/

http://www.philadelphiafaithandfreedom.com/independencehall
New York

Preamble:
   We The People of the State of New York, grateful to Almighty God for our Freedom, in order to secure its blessings, DO ESTABLISH THIS CONSTITUTION. 

Most certainly, how can a judge uphold the intents of the Constitution without the very reasons behind it's creation? 
"The fourth and fifth references to God are found in the last paragraph. The rightness of our cause was left to God as judge. “We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown…”

     If our Constitution was so godless, certainly it would have banned any mention of God or religious tests in state Constitutions, and yet, it did not as is seen in the state Constitutions to this day. The Constitution is only as powerful and as strong and true as those who swear to uphold it... You cannot be a Muslim and swear on a book written by a man.... a man who, in for all intents and purposes, wrote a book that called for making war against the very principles our country was founded upon. The Constitution is like a cake, but there is a list of things that went into that cake to make that cake... many people look at the Constitution and say "it is not an egg... yet it contains egg..." It is not oil, yet it was made using oil... It is not dry flour, yet flour was used to create it... And without Christian principles there would never, ever have been a Constitution, there NEVER would have been an America... and as a side note, without Christianity, there would still be slavery in Britain and America.. 

Alabama 1901, Preamble.
"We the people of the State of Alabama, invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish the following Constitution..."

Alaska 1956, Preamble.
"We, the people of Alaska, grateful to God and to those who founded our nation and pioneered this great land..."

Arizona 1911, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Arizona, grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution..."

Arkansas 1874, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Arkansas, grateful to Almighty God for the privilege of choosing our own form of government..."

California 1879, Preamble.
"We, the People of the State of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom..."

Colorado 1876, Preamble.
"We, the people of Colorado, with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of Universe..."

Connecticut 1818, Preamble.
"The People of Connecticut, acknowledging with gratitude the good Providence of God in permitting them to enjoy..."

Delaware 1897, Preamble.
"Through Divine Goodness all men have, by nature, the rights of worshipping and serving their Creator according to the dictates of their consciences..."

Florida 1885, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Florida, grateful to Almighty God for our constitutional liberty... establish this Constitution..."

Georgia 1777, Preamble.
"We, the people of Georgia, relying upon protection and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish this Constitution..."

Hawaii 1959, Preamble.
"We, the people of Hawaii, Grateful for Divine Guidance establish this Constitution..."

Idaho 1889, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Idaho, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings..."

Illinois 1870, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Illinois, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy and looking to Him for a blessing on our endeavors..."

Indiana 1851, Preamble.
"We, the People of the State of Indiana, grateful to Almighty God for the free exercise of the right to chose our form of government..."

Iowa 1857, Preamble.
"We, the People of the State of Iowa, grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of these blessings establish this Constitution..."

Kansas 1859, Preamble.
"We, the people of Kansas, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious privileges establish this Constitution..."

Kentucky 1891, Preamble.
"We, the people of the Commonwealth of Kentucky are grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties..."

Louisiana 1921, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Louisiana, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties we enjoy..."

Maine 1820, Preamble.
"We the People of Maine... acknowledging with grateful hearts the goodness of the Sovereign Ruler of the Universe in affording us an opportunity... and imploring His aid and direction..."

Maryland 1776, Preamble.
"We, the people of the state of Maryland, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberty..."

Massachusetts 1780, Preamble.
"We...the people of Massachusetts, acknowledging with grateful hearts, the goodness of the Great Legislator of the Universe... in the course of His Providence, an opportunity... and devoutly imploring His direction..."

Michigan 1908, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Michigan, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of freedom... establish this Constitution..."

Minnesota, 1857, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings..."

Mississippi 1890, Preamble.
"We, the people of Mississippi in convention assembled, grateful to Almighty God, and invoking His blessing on our work..."

Missouri 1845, Preamble.
"We, the people of Missouri, with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, and grateful for His goodness establish this Constitution..."

Montana 1889, Preamble.
"We, the people of Montana, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of liberty establish this Constitution..."

Nebraska 1875, Preamble.
"We, the people, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom establish this Constitution..."

Nevada 1864, Preamble.
"We the people of the State of Nevada, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom... establish this Constitution..."

New Hampshire 1792, Part I. Art. I. Sec. V. "Every individual has a natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience..."

New Jersey 1844, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of New Jersey, grateful to Almighty God for civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing on our endeavors..."

New Mexico 1911, Preamble.
"We, the People of New Mexico, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of liberty..."

New York 1846, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of New York, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings..."

North Carolina 1868, Preamble.
"We the people of the State of North Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations, for our civil, political, and religious liberties, and acknowledging our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those..."

North Dakota 1889, Preamble.
"We, the people of North Dakota, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, do ordain..."

Ohio 1852, Preamble.
"We the people of the state of Ohio, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings and to promote our common..."

Oklahoma 1907, Preamble.
"Invoking the guidance of Almighty God, in order to secure and perpetuate the blessings of liberty... establish this..."

Oregon 1857, Bill of Rights, Article I. Section 2. "All men shall be secure in the Natural right, to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences..."

Pennsylvania 1776, Preamble.
"We, the people of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance..."

Rhode Island 1842, Preamble.
"We the People of the State of Rhode Island grateful to Almighty God for the civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing..."

South Carolina, 1778, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of South Carolina grateful to God for our liberties, do ordain and establish this Constitution..."

South Dakota 1889, Preamble.
"We, the people of South Dakota, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberties... establish this..."

Tennessee 1796, Art. XI.III. "That all men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their conscience... "

Texas 1845, Preamble.
"We the People of the Republic of Texas, acknowledging, with gratitude, the grace and beneficence of God..."

Utah 1896, Preamble.
"Grateful to Almighty God for life and liberty, we establish this Constitution..."

Vermont 1777, Preamble.
"Whereas all government ought to... enable the individuals who compose it to enjoy their natural rights, and other blessings which the Author of Existence has bestowed on man..."

Virginia 1776, Bill of Rights, XVI. "Religion, or the Duty which we owe our Creator can be directed only by Reason... and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian Forbearance, Love and Charity towards each other..."

Washington 1889, Preamble.
"We the People of the State of Washington, grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution..."

West Virginia 1872, Preamble.
"Since through Divine Providence we enjoy the blessings of civil, political and religious liberty, we, the people of West Virginia .. reaffirm our faith in and constant reliance upon God..."

Wisconsin 1848, Preamble.
"We, the people of Wisconsin, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, domestic tranquility..."

Wyoming 1890, Preamble.
"We, the people of the State of Wyoming, grateful to God for our civil, political, and religious liberties... establish this Constitution..."

https://patriotpost.us/pages/208