Our Creator is Jesus Christ!

Proof! Justice! Jesus is our Creator!
4 blood moon on Jewish Holidays! The star of Bethlehem on the 4th of July signifying and confirming America, (the Declaration of independence is the embodiment of the gospel of Jesus Christ!), as the "safe land" "the promised land" to God's children! under the new covenant!

http://isaiah58ministries.blogspot.com/2016/08/a-storm-is-coming-slavery-to-heroine.html

Jesus is the Word. He Created us. Our Creator came into the earth in the vessel of flesh. Those who recognize their Creator, the Creator gives them his power to bring peace on the earth -in the form of the Gospel, Good News of Jesus Christ. 

Through Jesus our Creator, we have forgiveness of our sins! We are changed from sinner, transformed by the Creator's powerful spirit into Saints. We no longer sin or walk in the ways of this world. We now Love God and show forth God's love to one another. It is the duty, responsibility and right of all men to love God, Jesus their Creator and Love their fellow man!
John 1:

10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him: and the world knew him not.

11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

12 But as many as received him, to them he gave prerogative to be the sons of God, even to them that believe in his Name,

1 In the beginning was that Word, and that Word was with God, and that Word was God.

2 This same was in the beginning with God.

3 All things were made by it, and without it was made nothing that was made.

4 In it was life, and that life was the light of men.

5 And that light shineth in the wilderness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not.

Our Creator is Jesus Christ. 

The Declaration of Independence is the Declaration of Jesus Christ and his Gospel. 

Good News of Freedom from oppression. No man needs to serve the needs of others, but he is free to worship and reverence God; live free, own his land, have a family, provide for himself on his land! 

The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

Geneva Bible's explanation footnotes of John 1

1. John 1:1 The Son of God is of one, and the selfsame eternity or everlastingness, and of one and the selfsame essence or nature, with the Father.
2. John 1:1 From his beginning, as the Evangelist saith, 1 John 1:1, as though he said, that the world began not then to have his being, when God began to make all that was made: for the word was even then when all things that were made, began to be made, and therefore he was before the beginning of all things.
3. John 1:1 Had his being.
   
4. John 1:1 This word, That, pointeth out unto us a peculiar and choice thing above all other, and putteth a difference between this Word, which is the Son of God, and the Laws of God, which otherwise also are called the word of God.
5. John 1:1 This word (With) putteth out the distinction of persons to us.
6. John 1:1 This word (Word) is the first in order in the sentence, and is that which the learned call (Subjectum:) and this word (God) is the latter in order, and the same which the learned call (Predicatum.)
7. John 1:3 The son of God declareth that same his everlasting Godhead, both by the creating of all things, and also by the preserving of them, and especially by the excellent gifts of reason and understanding, wherewith he that beautified man above all other creatures.
8. John 1:3 Paul expoundeth this place, Col. 1:15 and 16.
9. John 1:3 That is, as the Father did work, so did the Son work with him: for he was fellow worker with him.
   
10. John 1:3 Of all those things which were made, nothing was made without him.
11. John 1:4 That is, by him: and it is spoken after the manner of the Hebrews, meaning thereby that by his force and working power all life cometh to the world.
12. John 1:4 To wit, even then, when all things are made by him, for else he would have said, Life is in him, and not life was.
13. John 1:4 That force of reason and understanding, which is kindled in our minds to acknowledge him, the author of so great a benefit.
14. John 1:5 The light of men is turned into darkness, but yet so that there is clearness enough to make them without excuse.
15. John 1:5 They could not perceive nor reach unto it, to receive any light of it, no, they did not so much as acknowledge him.
    
16. John 1:6 There is another more full manifestation of the Son of God, to the consideration whereof men are in good time stirred up, even by John’s voice, who is as it were the herald of Christ.
17. John 1:7 Through John.
18. John 1:8 That light which we spake of, to wit, Christ, who only can lighten our darkness.
19. John 1:9 When as the Son of God saw, that man did not acknowledge him by his works, although they were endued with understanding (which he had given to them all) he exhibited himself unto his people to be seen of them with their corporal eyes: yet neither so did they acknowledge him, nor receive him.
20. John 1:9 Who only and properly deserveth to be called the light, for he shineth of himself and borroweth light of none.
21. John 1:10 That person of the Word, was made manifest even at that time when the world was made.
    
22. John 1:11 The Word showed himself again, when he came in the flesh.
23. John 1:12 The Son being shut out of the most of his people, and acknowledged but of a few, doth regenerate them by his own virtue and power, and receiveth them into that honor which is common to all the children of God, that is to be the sons of God.
24. John 1:12 He vouchsafed to give them this prerogative to take them to be his children.
25. John 1:13 Of that gross and corrupt nature of man, which is throughout the Scriptures set as enemy to the Spirit.
26. John 1:14 That Son, who is God from everlasting, took upon him man’s nature, that one and the selfsame might be both God and man, which manifestly appeared to many witnesses, that saw him amongst whom he was conversant, and unto whom by sure and undoubted arguments he showed both his natures.
    
27. John 1:14 That is, man: so that the part is taken for the whole, by the figure Synecdoche: for he took upon him all our whole nature, that is to say, a true body, and a true soul.
28. John 1:14 For a season, and when that was ended, he went up into heaven: for the word which he useth, is taken from tents: and yet notwithstanding, his absence from us in body is not such, but that he is always present with us, though not in flesh, yet by the virtue of his Spirit.
29. John 1:14 The glory which he speaketh of here, is that manifestation of Christ’s majesty, which was as it were laid open before our eyes when the Son of God appeared in flesh.
30. John 1:14 This word (as) doth not in this place betoken a likeness, but the truth of the matter, for his meaning is this, that we saw such a glory, as beseemed and was meet for the true and only begotten Son of God, who is Lord and King over all the world.
    
31. John 1:14 He was not only a partaker of grace and truth, but was full of the very substance of grace and truth.
32. John 1:15 John is a faithful witness of the excellency of Christ.
33. John 1:15 That is, He before whom I am sent to prepare him the way: so that these words are referred to the time of his calling, and not of his age, for John was six months older than he.
34. John 1:15 This sentence hath in it a turning of the reason as we call it, as who would say, a setting of that first which should be last, and that last which should be first: for in plain speech this it is: He that cometh after me, is better than I am, for he was before me. The like kind of turning the reason we find in Luke 7:47: many sins are forgiven her, because she loved much, which is thus much to say, she loved much, because many sins are forgiven her.
    
35. John 1:16 Christ is the most plentiful fountain of all goodness, but then he poured out his gifts most bountifully, when as he exhibited and showed himself to the world.
36. John 1:16 That is grace upon grace, as a man would say graces heaped one upon another.
37. John 1:18 That true knowledge of God proceedeth only from Jesus Christ.
38. John 1:18 Who is nearest to his Father, not only in respect of his love towards him, but by the bond of nature, and for that union or oneness that is between them, whereby the Father and the Son are one.
39. John 1:18 Revealed him, and showed him unto us, whereas before he was hid under the shadows of the Law, so that the quickness of the sight of our minds was not able to perceive him: for whosoever seeth him, seeth the Father also.
40. John 1:19 John is neither the Messiah, nor like to any of the other Prophets, but is the herald of Christ, who is now present.
41. John 1:20 He did acknowledge him, and spake of him plainly and openly.
42. John 1:20 This repeating of the one and the selfsame thing, though in divers words, is used much of the Hebrews, and it hath great force: for they used to speak one thing twice, to set it out more certainly and plainly.
    
43. John 1:21 The Jews thought that Elijah should come again before the days of Messiah, and they took the ground of that their opinion out of Mal. 4:5, which place is to be understood of John, Matt. 11:14. And yet John denieth that he is Elijah, answering them indeed according as they meant.
44. John 1:21 They inquire of some great Prophet, and not of Christ, for John denied before, that he is Christ, for they thought that some great Prophet should be sent like unto Moses, wresting to that purpose that place of Deut. 18:15, which is to be understood of all the company of the Prophets and ministers, which have been and shall be to the end, and especially of Christ, who is the head of all Prophets.
45. John 1:24 Christ is the author of baptism, and not John: and therefore the force thereof consisteth not in John, who is the minister, but wholly in Christ the Lord.
    
46. John 1:25 Hereby we may prove that the Jews knew there should be some change in religion under Messiah.
47. John 1:26 Whom all the world seeth not, and is even amongst you.
48. John 1:29 The body and truth of all the sacrifices of the Law, to make satisfaction for the sin of the world, is in Christ.
49. John 1:29 This word (That) which is added, hath great force in it, not only to set forth the worthiness of Christ, and so to separate him from the Lamb which was a figure of him, and from all other sacrifices of the Law, but also to bring into our mind the Prophecies of Isaiah and others.
    
50. John 1:29 This word of the present time signifieth a continual act, for the Lamb hath this virtue proper unto him, and forever, to take away the sins of the world.
51. John 1:29 That is, that root of sins, to wit, our corruption, and so consequently, the fruits of sin, which are commonly called in the plural number sins.
52. John 1:31 I never knew him by face before.
53. John 1:32 Christ is proved to be the Son of God, by the coming down of the holy Ghost, by the Father’s voice, and by John’s testimony.
54. John 1:34 This word (That) pointeth out unto us some excellent thing, and maketh a difference between Christ and others, whom Moses and the Prophets commonly call the sons of God, or the sons of the most high.
    
55. John 1:35 John gathered disciples, not to himself, but to Christ.
56. John 1:36 Christ is set before us to follow not as a vain shadow, but as our Mediator.
57. John 1:37 In this first gathering of the disciples we have shown unto us, that the beginning of salvation is from God, who calleth us unto his Son by the ministry of his servants: whom (so preventing us) we must also hear, and follow him home, that being instructed by him, we may also instruct others.
58. John 1:38 Where is thy lodging?
59. John 1:39 The night grew on.
60. John 1:41 That is, anointed, and King after the manner of the Jewish people.
61. John 1:45 The good endeavors even of the unlearned, God doth so allow, that he maketh them masters to the learned.
62. John 1:46 We must especially take heed of false presumptions, which shut up against us the entrance to Christ.
    
63. John 1:47 Simple uprightness discerneth the true Israelites from the false.
64. John 1:48 The end of miracles is to set before us Christ the Almighty, and also the only author of our salvation, that we may apprehend him by faith.
65. John 1:51 By these words the power of God is signified which should appear in his ministry by the angels serving him as the head of the Church.

1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)

Paper Dollars Laws Made Because of Paper Bills, Debts Gun to Your Head

It is illegal. Only Gold coins and silver coins are legal. The dollar bill gives the wealthy an unequal ability to borrow money from the Fed that the rest of America does not have, thus making America a tyrannical state of those who can borrow the most money from the Federal reserve Bank and enslave everyone as "workers", under them. No one can pursue their God-given talents because the wealthy make everything too expensive. If I love to sew and make clothes it will cost me 200 times more what it cost a company because they can use foreign slave labor. It's an unfair, unjust and unequal system. It has put all men in the position of saying "Yes Sir, Master, what ever you say!" or lose your job, lose your house and everything else.

All laws made for the last 100 years are vetoed, null and void, illegal. You cannot "vote" to force people to "have money" to "buy" everything from others who poison the food, destroy the earth, destroy lives and enslave American people. No one has the God given "Right" to do so.
.....................................
It takes all day long to do things for yourself; raise your own animals, grow your own food, build your own homes, get water out of your well, heat your homes by chopping fire wood, recycling everything instead of sending it to the landfill, writing letters, instead of using telephones and computers, taking care of horses instead of driving cars, etc... We, as Americans, free to prosper this land, don't have time to "go" to school (we do have time for home education which is far superior anyway), go to college in order to just "go get job."
.................................
"You have to", one might say.

To get a job means you "trust others" to do most things for us without those people using deception or trying to cheat us. We are then meant to assume that everyone is honest and sincere and wouldn't harm someone else. Where are they getting this honesty from? Nowhere. How can we trust someone else?
......................................
Evil people made religion (true religion, and undefiled is to take care of the fatherless and the widow, Isaiah 58) illegal. That leaves us:
Without religion which gives men moral guide lines,
Without religion which gives gives men a "conscience", 
Without religion which causes people to not "fight" but live peacefully with others, 
Without religion, without morals, without a conscience, without peace... Left with only violence, (any sin is a violent act, even going to the mall to buy more shoes than you need or excessive makeup, which is vanity, are violent acts). Evil men make "profit" the most important goal.

..............................................
   

When profit is the goal, men lie, cheat, make false claims about their products, poison all the water, air and food in order to cut cost and save money- to make a profit. Men cut wages, take jobs overseas, lie in education so people don't have religion, morals, ethics or a conscience. All so they can enslave by evil forces, manipulating our minds.
Since you cannot trust anyone, because "love your neighbor and do good to others" is out the door, then to them, it's OK to lie, cheat, manipulate... It's OK for you to vote on things which puts the US government's guns to our heads to make us "trust" them and be slaves to a tyranny. This is called taxation without representation. You cannot appeal to your government for justice, or to make things right. They are doing wrong on purpose, for power, for personal profit and gain; they aren't going to find themselves guilty and punish themselves. They are not going to say, "you are right, We are wrong", then throw the book at themselves and put themselves in jail for breaking the law. 
   

Governments must be made of men who have a solid religious foundation (true, Godly religion). Governments must be made of men with morals. Governments must be made up of people who have morals and a conscience, men who would not dare, for any reason, to lower themselves to the corrupt ways of criminals, those without God.

This is one of the very best explanations of what government is supposed to be... we can never ask our government to use force when we personally would not....this is what Penn Jillette has to say and I would add 'do I think education is important? Yes! Would I give to help people of all ages to be educated? Yes!! Would I beg people to properly educate their children or give to help others? Yes!!! Would I even shame those who don't and write a book about Scrooge? Yes? Would I point a gun to their head and take their money, put them in jail, or take their home? Absolutely not....and yet we authorize, nay, we ENCOURAGE this violence everyday... o will I give my money to help someone build a library? Yeah! Will I ask other people to give their money to help build a library? Yeah! Will I beg other people to give money to build a library? Yeah! Will I lie to people to get them to give money to build a library? A little bit.

Will I use a gun to get someone to build a library? No.

And that is, in a nutshell, my entire view of politics: that I have to look over what people want the government to do and say “If I were given all the power, would I use a gun to accomplish what they want to accomplish?”

This is an edited transcript of Penn Jillette's remarks at the 2016 Cato Benefactor's Summit, first printed in the Spring 2016 Cato's Letter.

I got out of high school—notice I don’t say “graduated”—on a plea bargain. I had reasonable SATs, and I went to my principal in the beginning of my senior year and said that I wanted to pass, because it was important to my family that I actually finish high school.

But I wasn’t going to come to school any more, because I was sick of that, and I said that if he did not graduate me at the end of my senior year, I would give an impassioned speech to the school board that they were not dealing well with their gifted students.

He said to me, “Are you threatening me?” and I said “Yes.” And we made a deal.So before I finished high school, I was out on the road in the USA. I learned to eat fire, and I learned to juggle, and I went to Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Greatest Show on Earth Clown College.

(And I say “Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Greatest Show on Earth Clown College” all the way through, because if you worked for Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Greatest Show on Earth and you ever said “circus,” or “show,” or “the Ringling Show” without saying “Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Greatest Show on Earth,” you were fined. And we weren’t paid that much.)

I met Teller when I was 18, and we started putting together our magic show. I guess we were kind of fast-tracked to be Hollywood liberals—I’m in show business, I have this kind of impotent ponytail back here—I probably should be a liberal. I probably should be a Bernie Sanders supporter and I should be “Feeling the Bern”—but I’m not.

The way the media tend to present libertarians is that we’re conservatives, or we’re people with money who want to smoke dope. And it’s really not true at all for me. I do not come to libertarianism because I’m a really successful businessperson, or a CEO, or because I have to fight regulations.

I really come to it from a purely hippie point of view. I have always been a peacenik, and in the '80s I met a man named Tim Jenison. I was then just kind of your standard liberal, and Tim was libertarian.

I started giving all the arguments for why the government had to be more powerful, and Tim said a really simple sentence to me. He said, “Do you think it’s OK to punish people who’ve done nothing wrong?” And I said “No”—even though I felt somewhere in my heart that it was a trick question. And then he said, “Why is it OK to reward people who’ve done nothing right?”

He said, “Can’t you see that you can’t reward without punishing? They’re the same thing.” And that shut me up for a little while.

Then Tim started saying, “You know, you’re so against force. You’ve never hit anybody in your life. You’ve been beat up. You’ve been in carnival situations that have gone badly and people have hit you and you’ve not hit them back because you didn’t think it was life threatening. You are insanely peacenik in terms of the way you see war, what the country should do. Why do you think it’s so OK for the government to use force to get things done that you think are good ideas?”

I started thinking that one really good definition of government is that government is supposed to have a monopoly on force. The government is the guys with the guns, and we are the people who tell the government what they can do. So in my morality, I shouldn’t be able to tell anyone to do something with a gun that I wouldn’t do myself.

Now I want to add here that I am incompetent and I am a coward, so this is all theoretical, what I’m about to say—but if you asked me: Would I use a gun to stop a murder? Yeah! Would I use a gun to stop a rape? Yeah! Would I use the threat of a gun to stop a robbery? Yeah, I think you kind of have to. Would I use a gun to protect our country and our way of life? Yeah!

Would I use a gun to build a library? No!

Do I think libraries are really important? Wicked important! Really important! I came from a dead factory town in western Massachusetts, before the Internet. Without the Greenfield Public Library, I wouldn’t have had a chance. I rode my bike there every day. I read everything.When Frank Zappa put in the back of the album Lumpy Gravy, “Do not listen to this until you’ve read Kafka’s In the Penal Colony,” I jumped on my bike and rode to the library and read it, then came back to listen to the record. (I follow directions well.)

So will I give my money to help someone build a library? Yeah! Will I ask other people to give their money to help build a library? Yeah! Will I beg other people to give money to build a library? Yeah! Will I lie to people to get them to give money to build a library? A little bit.

Will I use a gun to get someone to build a library? No.

And that is, in a nutshell, my entire view of politics: that I have to look over what people want the government to do and say “If I were given all the power, would I use a gun to accomplish what they want to accomplish?”

I am a huge fan of art, and I am a huge fan of crazy art. But Teller and I, before we met Tim Jenison, and before we actually called ourselves “libertarians,” we had a lot of run-ins with government art groups.

There was a theater in Philadelphia called the Walnut Street Theatre—it’s still there—and upstairs at the Walnut Street Theatre was Theatre 5, which was a little tiny room that sat 100 people. And they had local grants, federal grants, just grants, grants, grants to put together little experimental theater shows in this 100-seat theater on the 5th floor of the Walnut Street Theatre.

They had all their money paid by the government, and they had to put up one new show, I think it was every six weeks. Teller and I, at this point, were street performers.

We went out to Head House Square in Philadelphia, and I would do a 12-minute juggling show, and I would then pass the hat. I was a very, very successful street performer.

We had a dream of doing a full evening show indoors. We needed a place, and Teller had gone to college with one of the guys who had these grants. But we didn’t know they had grants—we thought they were the same as us, that they made money from ticket sales.

They said that they couldn’t get their show together (six weeks with nothing else to do and they couldn’t do a show? Shakespeare’s in the public domain!) so they said, “You can have our theater to put your show on—you’d only have to pay us a little bit of money, and you can have the whole space and do the whole show.”

We were thrilled to pieces. Just thrilled to pieces! And we worked really hard (I mean, hard for show business.) We went out and did press releases and got reviews. And that 100-seat theater, when we were in there, was sold out for the whole six weeks.

Then the head of the Walnut Street Theatre found out that our show had been so successful—they’d never been successful in there at all—and came and talked to us. We didn’t know we were blowing the G on the joint—to use carny terms. We didn’t know we were giving up a secret, to use, I guess, regular-people terms.

He said, “How much of the grant money did you get?” And we said “Grant money? No, we just happened to have the theater — thank you so much, sir, we really appreciate it. It’s really helpful, you know, that small amount of rent we’re paying.” And he said, “Rent?!” I said, “This has been wonderful! We’re making our living, it’s going great.”

Well, anyway, they lost all their grants. And then there were all sorts of articles written on how Penn and Teller were destroying the arts in Philadelphia because we had lost the federal grants because we went and ratted out the people that were doing the real, important, significant work that we weren’t doing because we were “commercial.”

Then the 80s came around and there was all that controversy over a few artists— there was the Piss Christ art, and there was a New York artist named David Wojnarowicz. They did art that was very, very controversial, and very, very blasphemous.

They lost some of their National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grants, and I was then in a very awkward position. I was a freedom of speech nut, and I thought that they absolutely should have the right to do whatever art they wanted.

But I was also remembering my Theatre 5 days in Philadelphia—and I didn’t think that the government should pay for them. And although I was—am—an atheist, my mom and dad were very strong Christians, and I was very close to them.

And I had that image in my head of the gun. I looked at this art that I loved, that was so blasphemous to my mom and dad, and I was appalled by the idea that my mom and dad were having a gun held to their head to pay for art that I loved, but they didn’t.

And that to me was libertarianism in a nutshell. I wanted those artists to have their work everywhere. I wanted those artists to be very, very successful—but I did not want anyone that did not like that art to pay for it, and certainly not to be forced.

So when Wojnarowicz lost the grants from the NEA, I went over to his studio. He was a little surprised that I’d showed up there, because I’d been on TV a few days before saying that I didn’t think the NEA should exist at all, and he shouldn’t get any money whatsoever. I said, “I’d like to buy a lot of your work. I want to buy it because I really, really like it.”

As a matter of fact, with some of my friends, we bought enough art from him to actually make up for his grant. (And now I own that art and it’s worth a ton of money, so I turned out OK.)

I’ve read such wonderful defenses of the invisible hand, and I know how important it is to let the free market work—but I can’t say in good conscience that I’m absolutely sure that if you took regulations away and let the free market run wild that everyone would be doing better and everyone would be happy and everyone would be living in utopia. It makes sense that it would work, but I don’t know.

But I do know that if this is a government by the people, and I’m one of the people, and the government is the one with guns—I know that it is immoral for me to use the government to use force, to use guns, to do anything that I wouldn’t do myself. And that’s how I became a libertarian.

Penn Jillette is half of magic/comedy team Penn & Teller.

The Founding Fathers were so united in their opposition to paper money that they included this little gem in the Constitution, under Article I, Section 10:

“No State shall . . . make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts . . .”

‪#‎endthefed‬ ‪#‎nullifythefed‬ ‪#‎constitution‬‪#‎endthefed‬ ‪#‎nullifythefed‬ ‪#‎constitution‬